One word change made them 2% faster. No extra fitness required.

Listen to this issue as a podcast

One word. That is all it took.

Here is something that will either fascinate you or annoy you, depending on how much you believe performance is purely physical.

Researchers gave cyclists a simple instruction: talk to yourself during a time trial. But the twist was in the pronouns.

One group used first-person self-talk. "I can do this." "I feel strong." "I've got this."

The other group used second-person. "You can do this." "You feel strong." "You've got this."

Same words. Same intent. One letter different.

The second-person group completed a 10 km cycling time trial significantly faster (1,045 seconds vs 1,068 seconds). They produced more power. And here is the part that makes you sit up: they did not perceive any extra effort. Their RPE was the same. They rode harder and it did not feel harder.

That study (Hardy, Thomas & Blanchfield, 2019, Journal of Sports Sciences) built on earlier work by the same research group. In 2014, Blanchfield and colleagues published a landmark paper in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise showing that a two-week motivational self-talk intervention improved cycling time to exhaustion at 80% of peak power by 18%. From 637 seconds to 750 seconds. The mechanism? A significant reduction in perceived exertion at the same workload.

And then in 2023, the Journal of Applied Sport Psychology published a study showing that motivational self-talk reversed the performance damage caused by mental fatigue. Twelve men cycled to exhaustion at 80% peak power under three conditions: control, mental fatigue alone, and mental fatigue plus self-talk. The mental fatigue condition crushed performance, as expected. But when self-talk was added, performance returned to control levels. The fatigue was still there. The perception of it changed.

Here are three things worth sitting with:

1. Your brain runs a prediction model, and you can edit the inputs. The psychobiological model of endurance performance says that perceived exertion, not lactate, not muscle damage, is the ultimate limiter of how long you can sustain hard effort. Self-talk changes the perception. The physiology stays the same. The output goes up. This is not motivation. This is neuroscience.

2. Second person works better than first person, and no one fully knows why. The leading theory is that "you" creates a small psychological distance, as if a coach or trusted voice is speaking to you rather than you pleading with yourself. It shifts the internal dynamic from negotiation to instruction. Thirteen out of sixteen participants in the Hardy study went faster with second-person self-talk.

3. This works even when you are mentally fatigued. That is arguably the most useful finding. After a long day at work, after a stressful commute, after the mental load of normal adult life, your perceived exertion during training is already elevated before you clip in. Self-talk can claw that back. It does not fix the fatigue. It stops the fatigue from stealing your session.

What to do with this

If you race or do hard group rides: Pick two or three short second-person phrases and practise them in training before you need them in racing. "You are smooth." "You are in control." "Stay here." Keep them short, keep them calm, keep them instructional. Do not wait until you are dying to start using them. Build the habit when the effort is moderate so it is automatic when it matters.

If you train big hours: The back end of a long ride is where perceived exertion creeps up and quality drops off. Self-talk is free and it works precisely in that window. Use it in the last 60 to 90 minutes of a long ride when you would normally just survive. "You are still strong." "Hold the form." "Keep the cadence." It will not replace good fueling or pacing, but it stacks on top of them.

If you are time-capped: If you are training after work on limited sleep and accumulated life stress, you are starting every session with a higher RPE baseline. Self-talk is one of the few tools that directly targets that problem. It costs nothing, takes no extra time, and the evidence says it works. Try it for two weeks. If it feels awkward, good. That means you are doing something different.

Bottom line: Your legs are not always the limiting factor. Sometimes it is the story you are telling yourself while you ride. Change the narrator. Change the ride.

References: Hardy, J., Thomas, O. & Blanchfield, A.W. (2019). To me, to you: How you say things matters for endurance performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(18), 2122-2130. Blanchfield, A.W. et al. (2014). Talking yourself out of exhaustion: The effects of self-talk on endurance performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(5), 998-1007. Graham, J.D. et al. (2023). Motivational self-talk mitigates the harmful impact of mental fatigue on endurance performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 36(2).

On my mindRaising the standard

Something has shifted for me recently. Not in the training science. Not in the coaching. In what is now possible.

For fourteen years I have had ideas sitting in my head about how to make the coaching process better, sharper, more useful for the athletes I work with. Ideas I could see clearly but could not build. Not at a price I could afford. Not with the skills I had. They just sat there, waiting.

That has changed. Rapidly.

We are in a moment right now where the tools available to a small coaching business like mine have leapt forward in ways I still find hard to fully describe. I am not talking about gimmicks or shortcuts. I am talking about the ability to finally build the things I have always wanted to build, and let them do what they were always meant to do: unlock better outcomes for you.

I know that sounds cryptic. You will find out shortly what I have been working on behind the scenes.

But the question I keep coming back to is this. I think of it like a barbell. On one side, there are parts of the coaching and performance process that smart automation can now do better than I ever could as a single coach. Faster. More consistent. More thorough. And on the other side, there is the work that demands more of me as a human than ever before. More presence. More interpretation. More investigation into the things that are specific to you and your progress.

The trap would be getting stuck in the messy middle. Doing a bit of both, badly. I have no interest in that.

What I have been focused on is making sure I stay sharp on both ends of that barbell. Using the new tools to handle what they handle well. Freeing myself up to be more available, more thoughtful, and more connected to the coaching decisions that actually matter.

The core does not change. Evidence. Experience. Clear thinking. But the way I can deliver on that core is about to get a lot better.

It is an amazing time. And I want to make sure we move into it together.

Damian